The Prime Minister has the horrendous task of reconciling many conflicting opinions and priorities, whilst also seeking to honour the Referendum result, delivering a 'new, comprehensive, bold and ambitious free trade agreement’, protecting people’s jobs and security, and maintaining the integrity of our United Kingdom.
As the UK international Trade Secretary stated this summer “there had to be compromises, but Brexit had been backed by 17.4 million, and legislation implementing that decision had been approved by MPs”.
It is regrettable that some on both sides of the debate are now promoting worst case scenarios - rather than reflecting upon the potential of the Withdrawal agreement to deliver the referendum result and take back control of our borders, laws, money and trade, whilst also delivering reflecting upon the potential of the Withdrawal Agreement to deliver a mutually beneficial future relationship with the EU.
Brexiteers and Remainers on the Assembly External Affairs and Additional Legislation Committee united in calling for a post-exit transition period after taking detailed evidence, including:
- There must be no cliff edge to UK membership of the EU. The complexity of Article 50 negotiations means they will inevitably focus on how the UK will extricate itself from current arrangements. Future relationships with the EU and the rest of the world will have to be developed and agreed over a far longer period. Transitional arrangements which remain as close as possible to the existing position will provide the most stable platform for future negotiations.
- The Road Haulage Association told us that transitional arrangements may be necessary to ensure supply chain efficiency for the UK and the EU. The Freight Transport Association drew a comparison with the phased way in which the tariffs were harmonised when the UK entered the European Economic Community and argued that a similar phased process may need to be agreed for Brexit. In a similar vein, the RHA warned that the absence of transitional arrangements, or an outcome that results in no deal, could have serious negative consequences for Welsh ports.
Negotiations have followed a staged process which was known and understood from the outset, but some choose to misrepresent this as time wasted.
Future negotiations have to fit in to the political clock (with EU elections in the New Year) - and even when the detailed future relationship is then agreed, time will be needed to put the new trade/customs arrangements in place.
Last December, the European Council agreed that sufficient progress had been achieved in Phase One of the Brexit negotiations.
On that basis, they adopted draft guidelines to move to the second phase of negotiations, where both parties started discussions on a transition period and the framework for the future relationship.
The UK and EU agreed the transition period that will lead to the "orderly withdrawal" of the UK in March.
In May, UK Ministers accepted that once the future relationship with the EU has then been agreed, there would have to be an extended period of customs union membership for the whole UK while technology is developed to monitor the border between Ireland and Northern Ireland without imposing more permanent structures.
Some are therefore using what was agreed and accepted 7 and 8 months ago as an excuse for opposing the Withdrawal Agreement now.
The legal text is clear that both parties want to avoid the use of the backstop and that Article 50 cannot establish a permanent relationship- and the EU themselves have made it very clear that they do not want a post-Brexit UK to remain in extended Customs Union and Single Market membership.
However, we now see the grotesque chaos of Labour MPs in North Wales saying that they will vote against the Withdrawal Agreement because the UK would remain subject to EU rules for a period beyond our membership – when, from the outset, Welsh Labour’s joint ‘Brexit’ White Paper with Plaid Cymru called for the UK to remain subject to these rules forever.
Wales voted to leave the European Union, not the United Kingdom, yet Plaid Cymru tries to keep Wales in the EU, and drag it out of the UK – despite the UK being Wales’ biggest single market by far.
The only EU referendums to be re-run are those treaty referendums in both Denmark and Ireland which went against the EU.
UK funding to the EU is double the funding it receives back.
This will in future be retained in the UK and Wales should then receive the same quantum of funding as now.
Speaking after meeting the Prime Minister at last week’s RWS Winter Fair, NFU Cymru President “During this positive meeting, I commended the fact that the deal she has agreed is as close as possible to the free and frictionless trade conditions for agricultural and food products that we have been lobbying for over the past couple of years”.
The UK can negotiate trade agreements with 3rd countries, ready for implementation after the transition period – and at the G20 Summit last week the Prime Minister discussed trade with a number of countries, with Japan looking forward to being able to discuss the UK’s possible membership of the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership.
Instead of rejecting this deal, creating uncertainty and damaging jobs and investment, let us therefore build towards an outward looking Wales within a Global UK.